U.S. President
Barack Obama's effort to win legislative backing for military strikes
against Syria passed its first hurdle on Wednesday when a Senate
committee voted in favor, but the narrow margin of victory showed the
depth of U.S. caution.
In a possible sign of internal
unrest in Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's ruling Alawite sect in the
shadow of a likely U.S. intervention, Syrian opposition figures said
General Ali Habib, a former defense minister, had defected. Syria denied
the report.
Washington and Syria's
main backer, Russia, remained publicly at odds as Obama tried to build
his case for military action over chemical weapons before flying to
Russia for a G20 summit hosted by President Vladimir Putin on Thursday.
Putin
said U.S. congressional approval without a U.N. Security Council
resolution would be an act of aggression, and accused U.S. Secretary of
State John Kerry of lying by playing down the role of the militant group
al Qaeda with rebel forces.
With
Obama focused on building international support, administration
officials kept up their campaign of persuasion in Congress, where deep
U.S. skepticism about going to war was reflected in a House of
Representatives hearing.
Still,
after much jockeying over the exact wording, the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee approved a resolution authorizing the use of
military force in Syria in a vote that avoided party lines, with
Democrats and Republicans on both sides. The action cleared the way for a
vote in the full Senate, likely next week.
The
committee voted 10-7 in favor of a compromise resolution that sets a
60-day limit on any engagement in Syria, with a possible 30-day
extension, and bars the use of U.S. troops on the ground for combat
operations.
The administration is
trying to balance the views of many in Congress who want a narrowly
defined resolution against hawks such as Senator John McCain, who has
pushed for a broader resolution that would allow direct U.S. support for
rebels.
The Senate committee
adopted amendments proposed by McCain with policy goals of degrading
Assad's ability to use chemical weapons, increasing support for rebel
forces and reversing battlefield momentum to create conditions for
Assad's removal.
The authorization
still faces significant resistance in Congress, where many lawmakers
fear it could lead to a prolonged U.S. military involvement in Syria's
civil war and spark an escalation of regional violence.
The full Senate is expected to vote on the resolution next week. The House of Representatives also must approve the measure.
RUSSIAN TENSIONS
Obama
said he would continue to try to persuade Putin of the need for
punitive strikes on Assad for using chemical weapons when the two meet
in St. Petersburg.
In Stockholm en
route to Russia, Obama said the credibility of America and of the world
was at stake. He appeared to take umbrage at a reporter's question
about the "red line" he set for Assad at an August 2012 White House news
conference.
"I did not set a red line. The world set a red line," Obama said, referring to bans on chemical weapons use.
Putin
again questioned Western evidence. He accused Kerry outright of lying
when, in urging Congress to approve strikes on Syria, Kerry played down
the role of al Qaeda in the rebel forces. "Al Qaeda units are the main
military echelon, and they know this," Putin said.
"He is lying and knows he is lying. It's sad."
Earlier,
Putin had said in a pre-summit interview with the Associated Press that
he could not absolutely "rule out" Russia supporting a U.N. Security
Council resolution to punish Assad - if it could be proved he had used
poison gas.
Briefing members of
Congress in Washington, Kerry said those comments were "hopeful" and
"there may be a road forward where Russia would consider not blocking
action."
Kerry played down concerns that any U.S. military strike over chemical weapons might provoke a clash with Russia.
"Foreign
Minister (Sergei) Lavrov has made it clear ... Russia does not intend
to fight a war over Syria," Kerry told a hearing of the House Foreign
Affairs Committee.
A senior Western
official said that while Moscow was unlikely to say so in public, there
were signs Russian officials believe Assad was responsible for the
deaths on August 21 and that it had strained Russian support for him -
providing an opening for a new, concerted drive to end the conflict.
However,
Putin's characteristically blunt tone towards the U.S. position
appeared to limit prospects for a breakthrough in a stalemate that has
prevented international action to rein in a conflict that has killed
more than 100,000 Syrians and left millions homeless but which neither
side has been able to win.
"DEFECTION"
Numerous
defections over the past two years by senior commanders, either to the
rebel Free Syrian Army or into exile abroad, have not led to a collapse
of Assad's defenses.
Habib, the
former defense minister, had been under house arrest since he resigned
in protest at Assad's crackdown on demonstrators in 2011. He managed to
reach the Turkish border late on Tuesday with Western help, Kamal
al-Labwani of the Syrian National Coalition told Reuters.
Other
sources also said Habib had fled but Syrian state television denied he
had left his home. Turkey's foreign minister said he could not confirm
the general had defected.
The
flight of Habib, if confirmed, would lend credibility to suggestions
that parts of the Alawite community may be turning against Assad.
Previous high-level defections have generally involved Sunni officers.
"Ali
Habib has managed to escape from the grip of the regime and he is now
in Turkey, but this does not mean that he has joined the opposition. I
was told this by a Western diplomatic official," Labwani said from
Paris.
A Gulf source told Reuters
that Habib had crossed the Turkish frontier late on Tuesday with two or
three other people. He was taken across the border in a convoy of
vehicles.
Kerry said he did not
know if the report of Habib's defection was correct but "there are
currently defections taking place. I think there are something like 60
to 100 in the last day or so, officers and enlisted personnel."
In
an interview on Britain's Sky News, Bouthaina Shaaban, a senior adviser
to Assad, made no mention of the defection. She said the world should
wait for the outcome of a United Nations investigation into the use of
chemical weapons and blamed groups linked to al Qaeda for the alleged
gas attack last month.
MILITARY PLANS
Following
the failure of British Prime Minister David Cameron to win
parliamentary backing for air strikes last week, Washington has been
struggling to build an international coalition for action in the absence
of a U.N. resolution.
Kerry told
lawmakers that at least 10 countries had pledged to participate in a
U.S. military intervention in Syria, but he did not identify them nor
say what roles they might play.
France
and Turkey are the most significant military powers lining up behind
Obama. The French parliament debated Syria on Wednesday, though
President Francois Hollande does not need approval for action.
French
Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault told parliament that failure to strike
Assad would send a message to the likes of Iran and North Korea that
they could defy Western powers with impunity, notably over concerns
about their nuclear programs.
Obama has won the backing of key figures in the U.S. Congress, including among his Republican opponents.
But
in a sign of the tough road still ahead, Democrats and Republicans took
both sides in the Senate committee vote. Two Democrats, Tom Udall and
Chris Murphy, joined Republicans Marco Rubio, John Barrasso, James
Risch, Ron Johnson and Rand Paul in voting no.
In
the Senate, Democratic leader Harry Reid is guardedly confident that a
majority of the 100 members will vote yes, but is still unsure if he can
get the 60 votes needed to overcome Republican procedural roadblocks,
aides said.
In the 435-member
House, a senior Republican aide predicted that most of the 50 or so
Republicans backed by the anti-big government Tea Party movement will
vote no. A number of Democratic liberals are also expected to vote
against a resolution, placing the final outcome in doubt